Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Improving public health evaluation: a qualitative investigation of practitioners' needs

Authors
  • Denford, Sarah1
  • Lakshman, Rajalakshmi2
  • Callaghan, Margaret3
  • Abraham, Charles3
  • 1 University of Exeter, Children’s Health and Exercise Research Centre, Baring Court, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK , Exeter (United Kingdom)
  • 2 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK , Cambridge (United Kingdom)
  • 3 University of Exeter Medical School, Institute of Health Research, Exeter, UK , Exeter (United Kingdom)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Jan 30, 2018
Volume
18
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5075-8
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2011, the House of Lords published a report on Behaviour Change, in which they report that “a lot more could, and should, be done to improve the evaluation of interventions.” This study aimed to undertake a needs assessment of what kind of evaluation training and materials would be of most use to UK public health practitioners by conducting interviews with practitioners about everyday evaluation practice and needed guidance and materials.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 public health practitioners in two UK regions, Cambridgeshire and the South West. Participants included directors of public health, consultants in public health, health improvement advisors, public health intelligence, and public health research officers. A topic guide included questions designed to explore participants existing evaluation practice and their needs for further training and guidance. Data were analysed using thematic analyses.ResultsPractitioners highlighted the need for evaluation to defend the effectiveness of existing programs and protect funding provisions. However, practitioners often lacked training in evaluation, and felt unqualified to perform such a task. The majority of practitioners did not use, or were not aware of many existing evaluation guidance documents. They wanted quality-assured, practical guidance that relate to the real world settings in which they operate. Practitioners also mentioned the need for better links and support from academics in public health.ConclusionWhilst numerous guidance documents supporting public health evaluation exist, these documents are currently underused by practitioners – either because they are not considered useful, or because practitioners are not aware of them. Integrating existing guides into a catalogue of guidance documents, and developing a new-quality assured, practical and useful document may support the evaluation of public health programs. This in turn has the potential to identify those programs that are effective; thus improving public health and reducing financial waste.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times