Affordable Access

Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors
  • Chuang, M L
  • Hibberd, M G
  • Salton, C J
  • Beaudin, R A
  • Riley, M F
  • Parker, R A
  • Douglas, P S
  • Manning, W J
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2000
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
477–484
Identifiers
PMID: 10676697
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

Volumetric MRI and volumetric echocardiographic measures of LV volume and LVEF agree well and give similar results when used to stratify patients with dilated cardiomyopathy according to systolic function. Agreement is poor between biplane and volumetric methods and worse between biplane methods, which assigned 40% of patients to different categories according to LVEF. The choice of imaging method (volumetric or biplane) has a greater impact on the results than does the choice of imaging modality (echocardiography or MRI) when measuring LV volume and systolic function.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times