Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Implementation and impact of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs: a systematic scoping review

Authors
  • Donà, D.1, 2, 3
  • Barbieri, E.1
  • Daverio, M.4
  • Lundin, R.3
  • Giaquinto, C.1, 3
  • Zaoutis, T.5, 3
  • Sharland, M.2, 3
  • 1 Department for Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 3, Padua, 35141, Italy , Padua (Italy)
  • 2 St George’s University of London, London, UK , London (United Kingdom)
  • 3 Fondazione Penta ONLUS, Padua, Italy , Padua (Italy)
  • 4 University of Padua, Padua, Italy , Padua (Italy)
  • 5 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA , Philadelphia (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Jan 03, 2020
Volume
9
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0659-3
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundAntibiotics are the most common medicines prescribed to children in hospitals and the community, with a high proportion of potentially inappropriate use. Antibiotic misuse increases the risk of toxicity, raises healthcare costs, and selection of resistance. The primary aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current state of evidence of the implementation and outcomes of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) globally.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting on ASP in children aged 0–18 years and conducted in outpatient or in-hospital settings. Three investigators independently reviewed identified articles for inclusion and extracted relevant data.ResultsOf the 41,916 studies screened, 113 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Most of the studies originated in the USA (52.2%), while a minority were conducted in Europe (24.7%) or Asia (17.7%). Seventy-four (65.5%) studies used a before-and-after design, and sixteen (14.1%) were randomized trials. The majority (81.4%) described in-hospital ASPs with half of interventions in mixed pediatric wards and ten (8.8%) in emergency departments. Only sixteen (14.1%) studies focused on the costs of ASPs. Almost all the studies (79.6%) showed a significant reduction in inappropriate prescriptions. Compliance after ASP implementation increased. Sixteen of the included studies quantified cost savings related to the intervention with most of the decreases due to lower rates of drug administration. Seven studies showed an increased susceptibility of the bacteria analysed with a decrease in extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers E. coli and K. pneumoniae; a reduction in the rate of P. aeruginosa carbapenem resistance subsequent to an observed reduction in the rate of antimicrobial days of therapy; and, in two studies set in outpatient setting, an increase in erythromycin-sensitive S. pyogenes following a reduction in the use of macrolides.ConclusionsPediatric ASPs have a significant impact on the reduction of targeted and empiric antibiotic use, healthcare costs, and antimicrobial resistance in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Pediatric ASPs are now widely implemented in the USA, but considerable further adaptation is required to facilitate their uptake in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times