Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Immunogenicity of Biosimilars for Rheumatic Diseases, Plaque Psoriasis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review from Clinical Trials and Regulatory Documents

  • Strand, Vibeke1
  • Gonçalves, Joao2
  • Hickling, Timothy P.3
  • Jones, Heather E.4
  • Marshall, Lisa4
  • Isaacs, John D.5
  • 1 Stanford University School of Medicine, 306 Ramona Road, Portola Valley, Palo Alto, CA, 94028, USA , Palo Alto (United States)
  • 2 Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal , Lisbon (Portugal)
  • 3 Pfizer, Andover, MA, USA , Andover (United States)
  • 4 Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA , Collegeville (United States)
  • 5 Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK , Newcastle upon Tyne (United Kingdom)
Published Article
Springer International Publishing
Publication Date
Nov 13, 2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40259-019-00394-x
Springer Nature


The goal of this narrative review was to summarize immunogenicity data of biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for rheumatic diseases, plaque psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), available in peer-reviewed publications or regulatory documents. PubMed records and regulatory documents were searched for immunogenicity data of TNFα or CD20 inhibitor biosimilars or biosimilar candidates. Data collected included the proportion of patients positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs), proportion with neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) among ADAb-positive patients, ADAb/nAb assay characteristics, cross-reactivity, and the effects of ADAbs on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety. We identified eight biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for adalimumab (BI 695501, SB5, ABP 501, GP2017, PF-06410293, MSB-11022, FKB-327, ZRC-3197) four for etanercept (SB4, GP2015, CHS-0214, LBEC0101), and three each for infliximab (SB2, CT-P13, GP1111) and rituximab (CT-P10, GP2013, PF-05280586) with immunogenicity data. Randomized, head-to-head trials with reference products varied in design and methodology of ADAb/nAb detection. The lowest proportions of ADAb-positive (0–13%) and nAb-positive patients (0–3%) were observed in the trials of etanercept and its biosimilars, and the highest with adalimumab, infliximab, and their biosimilars (ADAbs: ≤ 64%; nAbs: ≤ 100%). The most common method of ADAb detection was electrochemiluminescence, and ADAb positivity was associated with nominally inferior efficacy and safety. Overall, there were no significant immunogenicity differences between biosimilars and reference products. However, there are many discrepancies in assessing and reporting clinical immunogenicity. In conclusion, immunogenicity data of biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for TNFα or CD20 inhibitors were collected in trials that varied in design and procedures for ADAb/nAb detection. In general, immunogenicity parameters of biosimilars are similar to those of their reference products.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times