Affordable Access

deepdyve-link deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Authors
  • Klitzman, Robert L
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE
Publication Date
Feb 01, 2013
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
8–19
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.8
PMID: 23485667
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

IRBs have been criticized for long and complicated consent forms, but how IRBs make decisions about these issues hasn't been examined. I contacted leaders of 60 IRBs, and interviewed IRB leaders from 34 (response rate = 55%), and 13 members and administrators. IRBs confront challenges and dilemmas regarding these documents: what and how much these forms should include (e.g., how "perfect" forms should be). While IRBs generally seek to decrease the length and complexity, institutions and industry funders often want these forms to be legal documents. IRBs may also "nitpick" these documents without realizing the costs. This study, the first to explore how IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms, suggests underlying tensions, ambiguities, and subjectivities that have important implications for future policy, practice, education, and research.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times