Affordable Access

Access to the full text

History for some or lesson for all? A systematic review and meta-analysis on the immediate and long-term mental health impact of the 2002–2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak

Authors
  • Chau, Steven W. H.1, 1
  • Wong, Oscar W. H.1
  • Ramakrishnan, Rema2
  • Chan, Sandra S. M.1
  • Wong, Evelyn K. Y.3
  • Li, Pinky Y. T.1
  • Raymont, Vanessa2
  • Elliot, Kathryn4
  • Rathod, Shanaya5
  • Delanerolle, Gayathri2
  • Phiri, Peter4, 5
  • 1 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong , Shatin (Hong Kong SAR China)
  • 2 University of Oxford, Oxford, UK , Oxford (United Kingdom)
  • 3 North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, Hong Kong , Sheung Shui (Hong Kong SAR China)
  • 4 Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK , Southampton (United Kingdom)
  • 5 University of Southampton, Southampton, UK , Southampton (United Kingdom)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Apr 07, 2021
Volume
21
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10701-3
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundThe aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to examine the prevalence of adverse mental health outcomes, both short-term and long-term, among SARS patients, healthcare workers and the general public of SARS-affected regions, and to examine the protective and risk factors associated with these mental health outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of the literature using databases such as Medline, Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection, CNKI, the National Central Library Online Catalog and dissertation databases to identify studies in the English or Chinese language published between January 2003 to May 2020 which reported psychological distress and mental health morbidities among SARS patients, healthcare workers, and the general public in regions with major SARS outbreaks.ResultsThe literature search yielded 6984 titles. Screening resulted in 80 papers for the review, 35 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of post-recovery probable or clinician-diagnosed anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among SARS survivors were 19, 20 and 28%, respectively. The prevalence of these outcomes among studies conducted within and beyond 6 months post-discharge was not significantly different. Certain aspects of mental health-related quality of life measures among SARS survivors remained impaired beyond 6 months post-discharge. The prevalence of probable depressive disorder and PTSD among healthcare workers post-SARS were 12 and 11%, respectively. The general public had increased anxiety levels during SARS, but whether there was a clinically significant population-wide mental health impact remained inconclusive. Narrative synthesis revealed occupational exposure to SARS patients and perceived stigmatisation to be risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers, although causality could not be determined due to the limitations of the studies.ConclusionsThe chronicity of psychiatric morbidities among SARS survivors should alert us to the potential long-term mental health complications of covid-19 patients. Healthcare workers working in high-risk venues should be given adequate mental health support. Stigmatisation against patients and healthcare workers should be explored and addressed. The significant risk of bias and high degree of heterogeneity among included studies limited the certainty of the body of evidence of the review.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times