Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera.

Authors
  • Gao, Ke1
  • Torres-Vila, Luis M2
  • Zalucki, Myron P3
  • Li, Yiping4
  • Griepink, Frans5
  • Heckel, David G6
  • Groot, Astrid T1, 6
  • 1 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 2 Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Rural PAyT, Badajoz, Spain. , (Spain)
  • 3 School of Biological Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 4 Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China. , (China)
  • 5 Pherobank BV, Wijk bij Duurstede, The Netherlands. , (Netherlands)
  • 6 Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Entomology, Jena, Germany. , (Germany)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Publication Date
Nov 01, 2020
Volume
76
Issue
11
Pages
3596–3605
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5893
PMID: 32406164
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Geographic variation in male response to sex pheromone lures has been studied in the field in a number of moth species. However, only a few studies have investigated geographic variation in female calling and sex pheromone under field conditions. For an effective field implementation of sex pheromone lures, it is essential to know the local sex pheromone blend and local timing of sexual communication. We investigated the level and extent of geographic variation in the sexual communication of the important agricultural pest Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in three continents. We found there is no genetic variation in the calling behavior of H. armigera. In the female sex pheromone, we found more between-population variation than within-population variation. In male response experiments, we found geographic variation as well. Strikingly, when adding the antagonistic compound Z11-16:OAc to the pheromone blend of H. armigera, significantly fewer males were caught in Australia and China, but not in Spain. This variation is likely not only due to local environmental conditions, such as photoperiod and temperature, but also to the presence of other closely related species with which communication interference may occur. Finding geographic variation in both the female sexual signal and the male response in this pest calls for region-specific pheromone lures. Our study shows that the analysis of geographic variation in moth female sex pheromones as well as male responses is important for effectively monitoring pest species that occur around the globe. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times