Affordable Access

A Möbius inversion formula for generalized Lefschetz numbers

Publication Date
  • Mathematics


Ferrario, D.L. Osaka J. Math. 40 (2003), 345–363 A M ¨OBIUS INVERSION FORMULA FOR GENERALIZED LEFSCHETZ NUMBERS DAVIDE L. FERRARIO (Received November 12, 2001) 1. Introduction Let be a finite group and : → an equivariant map. A common way of studying the properties of is looking at the restrictions : → to the spaces fixed by the subgroups of , as non-equivariant maps. For example, if and are -CW complexes, then : → is a -equivariant homotopy equivalence if and only if for every the map is a homotopy equivalence; a similar result re- lated to a -retraction is due to Jaworowski: a locally compact, separable metric and finite-dimensional -space is a -ENR if and only if for every the fixed point set is an ENR [11]. This paper is addressed to studying fixed points (up to com- pactly fixed -homotopy) of a -equivariant self-map : ⊂ → , where is a -ENR or a smooth -manifold. If there is a compactly fixed -homotopy , ∈ , such that 0 = and 1 is fixed point free, then for every subgroup there is a compactly fixed homotopy such that 0 = and 1 is fixed point free, and this means that every restriction can be deformed to a fixed point free map. To investigate under which conditions the converse of this statement is true, it is neces- sary to exhibit the algebraic obstructions of the existence of the equivariant deforma- tion , and then relate them to the corresponding obstructions of the non-equivariant restrictions . Under some dimensional assumptions, Nielsen theory is exactly what describes these invariants; if is a manifold of dimension different from 2 then the generalized Lefschetz number L( ) or equivalently the Nielsen number ( ) van- ish if and only if can be deformed to be fixed point free (it is the Converse of the Lefschetz Property). So the problem can be stated algebraically as: under which conditions does the knowledge of the generalized Lefschetz numbers L( ) allow to compute the obstructions to an equivariant deformation? Again, it is necessary to relate the latter obstruction to

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.