Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Authors
  • Posadzki, Pawel1, 2
  • Pieper, Dawid3
  • Bajpai, Ram4
  • Makaruk, Hubert5
  • Könsgen, Nadja3
  • Neuhaus, Annika Lena3
  • Semwal, Monika6
  • 1 Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK , York (United Kingdom)
  • 2 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore , Singapore (Singapore)
  • 3 Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany , Witten (Germany)
  • 4 Keele University, Staffordshire, UK , Staffordshire (United Kingdom)
  • 5 Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Faculty Physical Education and Health, Biala Podlaska, Poland , Biala Podlaska (Poland)
  • 6 University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, USA , Austin (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Nov 16, 2020
Volume
20
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09855-3
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundSedentary lifestyle is a major risk factor for noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes. It has been estimated that approximately 3.2 million deaths each year are attributable to insufficient levels of physical activity. We evaluated the available evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) on the effectiveness of exercise/physical activity for various health outcomes.MethodsOverview and meta-analysis. The Cochrane Library was searched from 01.01.2000 to issue 1, 2019. No language restrictions were imposed. Only CSRs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Both healthy individuals, those at risk of a disease, and medically compromised patients of any age and gender were eligible. We evaluated any type of exercise or physical activity interventions; against any types of controls; and measuring any type of health-related outcome measures. The AMSTAR-2 tool for assessing the methodological quality of the included studies was utilised.ResultsHundred and fifty CSRs met the inclusion criteria. There were 54 different conditions. Majority of CSRs were of high methodological quality. Hundred and thirty CSRs employed meta-analytic techniques and 20 did not. Limitations for studies were the most common reasons for downgrading the quality of the evidence. Based on 10 CSRs and 187 RCTs with 27,671 participants, there was a 13% reduction in mortality rates risk ratio (RR) 0.87 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.78 to 0.96]; I2 = 26.6%, [prediction interval (PI) 0.70, 1.07], median effect size (MES) = 0.93 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.81, 1.00]. Data from 15 CSRs and 408 RCTs with 32,984 participants showed a small improvement in quality of life (QOL) standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.18 [95% CI 0.08, 0.28]; I2 = 74.3%; PI -0.18, 0.53], MES = 0.20 [IQR 0.07, 0.39]. Subgroup analyses by the type of condition showed that the magnitude of effect size was the largest among patients with mental health conditions.ConclusionThere is a plethora of CSRs evaluating the effectiveness of physical activity/exercise. The evidence suggests that physical activity/exercise reduces mortality rates and improves QOL with minimal or no safety concerns.Trial registrationRegistered in PROSPERO (CRD42019120295) on 10th January 2019.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times