Affordable Access

Publisher Website

[Evaluation of the relevance of the pharmaceutical educational interview on the knowledge and satisfaction of patients who received a vagus nerve neurostimulator implantation].

Authors
  • Marqueyssat, Gaël-Sean1
  • Valton, Luc2
  • Civade, Elodie3
  • Laborde, Charlotte4
  • 1 Pôle pharmacie, équipe de pôle neurosciences et céphalique, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: [email protected]. , (France)
  • 2 Explorations neurophysiologiques, CHU de Purpan, Toulouse, France; Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition (CerCo), University of Toulouse, 31300 Toulouse, France. , (France)
  • 3 Pôle pharmacie, équipe de pôle neurosciences et céphalique, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. , (France)
  • 4 Pôle pharmacie, équipe de pôle neurosciences et céphalique, I2MC équipe Ceramic, UFR Santé service de Pharmacie clinique, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. , (France)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2024
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
163–173
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2023.08.005
PMID: 37625530
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
French
License
Unknown

Abstract

Vagal neurostimulation (VNS) medical devices (MDs) are used to treat drug-resistant epilepsy. Using a magnet, the patient can activate on the stimulations in order to stop a seizure or interrupt the adverse effects (AEs) of the device. The objective is to evaluate the improvement of the patients' knowledge about the VNS following a pharmaceutical educational interview (PEI) as well as their satisfaction. The pharmaceutical educational interview regarding drugs and DMs was performed by the clinical pharmacist at the patient's bed after VNS implantation. A questionnaire about VNS devices (operation, adverse effects, recommendations) and assessing knowledge was submitted to patients before and after the PEI. Satisfaction was assessed by the Likert scale. From March 2020 to August 2021, 18 implanted patients were included in the study. In 78% of cases (14/18), the total number of good responses after PEI increased. The mean good response was significantly increased from 16.11/25 (64%) before PEI to 22.33/25 (89%) after PEI (P-value<0.01). The maximum satisfaction score (4/4) was given in 71% of the items. The results support the relevance of PEI. Patients feel a need for information and consider the interview useful. An improvement in knowledge was observed, which allows us to hope for an optimization of the effectiveness of the device, in particular, a reduction in seizures and AE. This study shows the feasibility and the interest of the development of clinical pharmacy applied to medical devices in complementarity with the expertise on drugs. Copyright © 2023 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times