Affordable Access

Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.

Authors
  • Dotto, Sidney Ricardo
  • Travassos, Rosana Maria Coelho
  • de Oliveira, Elias Pandonor Motcy
  • Machado, Manoel Eduardo de Lima
  • Martins, José Luiz
Type
Published Article
Journal
Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2007
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
62–65
Identifiers
PMID: 17697246
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the efficacy of 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) gel and 17% EDTA solution in cleaning dentine walls after root canal instrumentation. Thirty human canine teeth were divided into three groups of 10 teeth each. In Group 1, 1% sodium hypochlorite was used as the irrigating solution; in Group 2, 1% sodium hypochlorite was used with 17% EDTA solution; and in Group 3, 1% sodium hypochlorite was used with 24% EDTA gel. The presence of a smear layer was analysed after instrumentation using scanning electron microscopy. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between Groups 1 and 2, and also between Groups 1 and 3. No difference was observed between Groups 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). The results indicate that 1% sodium hypochlorite alone does not remove the smear layer and that there was no statistical difference between EDTA gel and EDTA solution in smear layer removal.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times