Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Evaluation and comparison of oral function after resection of cancer of the upper gingiva in patients who underwent reconstruction surgery versus those treated with a prosthesis

Authors
  • Ohashi, Yu1, 2
  • Shiga, Kiyoto3, 2
  • Katagiri, Katsunori3, 2
  • Saito, Daisuke3, 2
  • Oikawa, Shin-ichi3, 2
  • Tsuchida, Kodai3, 2
  • Ikeda, Aya3, 2
  • Miyaguchi, Jun3, 2
  • Kusaka, Takahiro3, 2
  • Yamada, Hiroyuki1, 2
  • 1 Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan , Morioka (Japan)
  • 2 Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba, Japan , Yahaba (Japan)
  • 3 Iwate Medical University, Yahaba, Japan , Yahaba (Japan)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Oral Health
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Jul 15, 2021
Volume
21
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01709-7
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
Disciplines
  • Research
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundWe retrospectively analyzed the articulation, mastication, and swallowing function of patients who underwent reconstruction or used a prosthesis after resection of the upper gingiva.MethodsThis study included patients who underwent resection of cancer of the upper gingiva from January 2014 to December 2018. Articulatory function was evaluated with Hirose’s conversational function evaluation criteria. Mastication function was evaluated with the Yamamoto’s occlusion table. Swallowing function was assessed with the MTF (Method of intake, Time, Food) score.ResultsThe mean articulatory function score was 8 points in the Reconstruction Surgery Group (RSG) and 8.8 points in the Prosthesis Group (PG). The mean mastication function score was 2.8 points in the RSG and 3.3 points in the PG. The mean swallowing function score was M3T4F4 in the RSG and M4T4F4.3 in the PG.ConclusionsThe prosthesis depends on the remaining occlusal support area. Our study suggest that prosthesis is better indication when there is more than one occlusal support area.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times