Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Hyams, Travis1, 2
  • Golden, Bruce1
  • Sammarco, John3
  • Sultan, Shahnaz4
  • King-Marshall, Evelyn1
  • Wang, Min Qi1
  • Curbow, Barbara1
  • 1 University of Maryland, College Park, USA , College Park (United States)
  • 2 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA , Bethesda (United States)
  • 3 Definitive Business Solutions, Inc., 11921 Freedom Drive, Suite 550, Reston, VA, 20190, USA , Reston (United States)
  • 4 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA , Minneapolis (United States)
Published Article
BMC Health Services Research
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Jul 29, 2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06705-9
Springer Nature
  • Organization, structure and delivery of healthcare


BackgroundIn 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated their recommendation, stating that individuals ages 45-49 should initiate screening for colorectal cancer. Since several screening strategies are recommended, making a shared decision involves including an individual’s preferences. Few studies have included individuals under age 50. In this study, we use a multicriteria decision analysis technique called the Analytic Hierarchy Process to explore preferences for screening strategies and evaluate whether preferences vary by age.MethodsParticipants evaluated a hierarchy with 3 decision alternatives (colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and computed tomography colonography), 3 criteria (test effectiveness, the screening plan, and features of the test) and 7 sub-criteria. We used the linear fit method to calculate consistency ratios and the eigenvector method for group preferences. We conducted sensitivity analysis to assess whether results are robust to change and tested differences in preferences by participant variables using chi-square and analysis of variance.ResultsOf the 579 individuals surveyed, 556 (96%) provided complete responses to the AHP portion of the survey. Of these, 247 participants gave responses consistent enough (CR < 0.18) to be included in the final analysis. Participants that were either white or have lower health literacy were more likely to be excluded due to inconsistency. Colonoscopy was the preferred strategy in those < 50 and fecal immunochemical test was preferred by those over age 50 (p = 0.002). These results were consistent when we restricted analysis to individuals ages 45-55 (p = 0.011). Participants rated test effectiveness as the most important criteria for making their decision (weight = 0.555). Sensitivity analysis showed our results were robust to shifts in criteria and sub-criteria weights.ConclusionsWe reveal potential differences in preferences for screening strategies by age that could influence the adoption of screening programs to include individuals under age 50. Researchers and practitioners should consider at-home interventions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assist with the formulation of preferences that are key to shared decision-making. The costs associated with different preferences for screening strategies should be explored further if limited resources must be allocated to screen individuals ages 45-49.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times