Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Establishing content validity for a composite activities-specific risk of falls scale:linkage between fear of falling and physical activity

Authors
  • Wang, Jing X.1
  • Chen, Lin Y.1
  • Jiang, Yan N.2
  • Ni, Ling2
  • Sheng, Jie M.2
  • Shen, Xia1, 2, 3
  • 1 Shanghai YangZhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201619, China , Shanghai (China)
  • 2 Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China , Shanghai (China)
  • 3 Yangzhi Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, 201619, China , Shanghai (China)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Apr 26, 2021
Volume
21
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02211-z
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundFear of falling (FoF) and physical activity (PA) are important psychological and behavioral factors associated with falls. No instrument quantifies the link between these two factors to evaluate the risk of falls. We aimed to design a scale linking FoF with PA (Composite Activities-specific Risk of Falls Scale, CARFS) for people with various disability levels.MethodsFirst, we designed a questionnaire comprising 40 balance-related activities from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) for a pilot survey. Second, participants were interviewed about their activities-specific FoF degree and PA frequency. The participants comprised 30 community-dwelling older adults, hospitalized patients with strokes, and those with spinal cord injuries, each with different disability levels. Third, the content validity of the items was evaluated twice by 12 experienced rehabilitation professionals: one based on experience and the other on the survey responses. Items with a higher than moderate relevance in both evaluations were included in the CARFS. The panel of professionals discussed and voted on the contribution of FoF and PA on the CARF score. Finally, the scale sensitivity in distinguishing disability levels was analyzed to evaluate the population suitability to the CARFS.ResultsThe CARFS included 14 activities. A five-point Likert scale was used to quantify degree of FoF (A) and frequency of PA (B). The CARF score (C), which was determined using the eq. C = A+(4-B) + A × B/2, reflected sensitivity to disability levels in most items.ConclusionsThe CARFS has strong content validity for measuring risk of falls in relation to the FoF and PA of people with various disability levels. It has a potential to provide a guide for designing individualized exercise- and behavior-focused fall prevention programs and enable the precise trtrun 0acking of program effectiveness as a multidimensional outcome measure.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times