Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Epistemic Oppression, Construct Validity, and Scientific Rigor: Commentary on Woo et al. (2022).

Authors
  • Gómez, Jennifer M1
  • 1 Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS), Stanford University, and Center for Institutional Courage, Palo Alto, California.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2023
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
32–38
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1177/17456916211072830
PMID: 35687744
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

In this commentary, I highlight flaws in the article by Woo and colleagues (this issue) that undermine its credibility and utility as rigorous science that contributes to the field. I do so by discussing (a) the concept of epistemic oppression regarding the glaring exclusion of multiple germane bodies of research and (b) the importance of including construct validity within a psychometric article regarding the Graduate Record Examination (GRE). I conclude with a plea to the authors that the matter of anti-Black violence and murder, which they reference, is one to be taken respectfully, seriously, and somberly.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times