Affordable Access

Engagement and adherence trade-offs for SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing.

Authors
  • Lucas, Tim C D
  • Davis, Emma L
  • Ayabina, Diepreye
  • Borlase, Anna
  • Crellen, Thomas
  • Pi, Li
  • Medley, Graham F
  • Yardley, Lucy
  • Klepac, Petra
  • Gog, Julia
  • Déirdre Hollingsworth, T
Publication Date
May 31, 2021
Source
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Keywords
Language
English
License
Green
External links

Abstract

Contact tracing is an important tool for allowing countries to ease lockdown policies introduced to combat SARS-CoV-2. For contact tracing to be effective, those with symptoms must self-report themselves while their contacts must self-isolate when asked. However, policies such as legal enforcement of self-isolation can create trade-offs by dissuading individuals from self-reporting. We use an existing branching process model to examine which aspects of contact tracing adherence should be prioritized. We consider an inverse relationship between self-isolation adherence and self-reporting engagement, assuming that increasingly strict self-isolation policies will result in fewer individuals self-reporting to the programme. We find that policies which increase the average duration of self-isolation, or that increase the probability that people self-isolate at all, at the expense of reduced self-reporting rate, will not decrease the risk of a large outbreak and may increase the risk, depending on the strength of the trade-off. These results suggest that policies to increase self-isolation adherence should be implemented carefully. Policies that increase self-isolation adherence at the cost of self-reporting rates should be avoided. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK'.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times