Endovascular therapy in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion and patent circle of Willis.

Occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may extend into the middle or anterior cerebral artery (ICA-T) or be confined to the intracranial (ICA-I) or extracranial segment (ICA-E). While there is excellent evidence for endovascular therapy (EVT) in ICA-T occlusions, studies on EVT in non-tandem ICA-I or ICA-E occlusions are scarce. To characterize EVT-treated patients with ICA-I- and ICA-E occlusion by comparing them with ICA-T occlusions. The German Stroke Registry (GSR), a national, multicenter, prospective registry was searched for EVT-treated patients with isolated ICA occlusion between June 2015 and December 2021. We stratified patients by ICA occlusion site: (a) ICA-T, (b) ICA-I, (c) ICA-E. Baseline factors, procedural variables, technical (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI)), and functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale score at 3 months) were analyzed. Of 13 082 GSR patients, 2588 (19.8%) presented with an isolated ICA occlusion, thereof 1946 (75.2%) ICA-T, 366 (14.1%) ICA-I, and 276 (10.7%) ICA-E patients. The groups differed in age (77 vs 76 vs 74 years, Ptrend=0.02), sex (53.4 vs 48.9 vs 43.1% female, Ptrend<0.01), and stroke severity (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission 17 vs 14 vs 13 points, Ptrend<0.001). In comparison with ICA-T occlusions, both ICA-I and ICA-E occlusions had lower rates of successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3: 85.4% vs 80.4% vs 76.3%; aOR (95% CI for ICA-I vs ICA-T 0.71 (0.53 to 0.95); aOR (95% CI) for ICA-E vs ICA-T 0.57 (0.42 to 0.78)). In adjusted analyses, ICA-E occlusion was associated with worse outcome when compared with ICA-T occlusion (mRS ordinal shift, cOR (95% CI) 0.70 (0.52 to 0.93)). Patient characteristics and outcomes differ substantially between ICA-T, ICA-I, and ICA-E occlusions. These results warrant further studies on EVT in ICA-I and ICA-E patients. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.