Effectiveness of AI-powered Chatbots in responding to orthopaedic postgraduate exam questions-an observational study.
- Authors
- Type
- Published Article
- Journal
- International Orthopaedics
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Publication Date
- Aug 01, 2024
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1963–1969
- Identifiers
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06182-9
- PMID: 38619565
- Source
- Medline
- Keywords
- Language
- English
- License
- Unknown
Abstract
This study analyses the performance and proficiency of the three Artificial Intelligence (AI) generative chatbots (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, Bard Google AI®) and in answering the Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) of postgraduate (PG) level orthopaedic qualifying examinations. A series of 120 mock Single Best Answer' (SBA) MCQs with four possible options named A, B, C and D as answers on various musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions covering Trauma and Orthopaedic curricula were compiled. A standardised text prompt was used to generate and feed ChatGPT (both 3.5 and 4.0 versions) and Google Bard programs, which were then statistically analysed. Significant differences were found between responses from Chat GPT 3.5 with Chat GPT 4.0 (Chi square = 27.2, P < 0.001) and on comparing both Chat GPT 3.5 (Chi square = 63.852, P < 0.001) with Chat GPT 4.0 (Chi square = 44.246, P < 0.001) with. Bard Google AI® had 100% efficiency and was significantly more efficient than both Chat GPT 3.5 with Chat GPT 4.0 (p < 0.0001). The results demonstrate the variable potential of the different AI generative chatbots (Chat GPT 3.5, Chat GPT 4.0 and Bard Google) in their ability to answer the MCQ of PG-level orthopaedic qualifying examinations. Bard Google AI® has shown superior performance than both ChatGPT versions, underlining the potential of such large language processing models in processing and applying orthopaedic subspecialty knowledge at a PG level. © 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
