Affordable Access

Access to the full text

The effect of rapid maxillary expansion on the upper airway’s aerodynamic characteristics

Authors
  • Feng, Xin1
  • Chen, Yicheng2
  • Hellén-Halme, Kristina3
  • Cai, Weihua4
  • Shi, Xie-Qi1, 3
  • 1 University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, Bergen, 5009, Norway , Bergen (Norway)
  • 2 Harbin Institute of Technology, Xi Da Zhi Street, Nangang, Harbin, 150001, People’s Republic of China , Nangang (China)
  • 3 Malmö University, 205 06, Malmö, Sweden , Malmö (Sweden)
  • 4 Northeast Electric Power University, Changchun Road 169, Changchun, Jilin, 132012, People’s Republic of China , Changchun (China)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Oral Health
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Mar 17, 2021
Volume
21
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01488-1
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundThe effect of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the upper airway (UA) has been studied earlier but without a consistent conclusion. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of RME on the UA function in terms of aerodynamic characteristics by applying a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study consists of seventeen cases with two consecutive CBCT scans obtained before (T0) and after (T1) RME. Patients were divided into two groups with respect to patency of the nasopharyngeal airway as expressed in the adenoidal nasopharyngeal ratio (AN): group 1 was comprised of patients with an AN ratio < 0.6 and group 2 encompassing those with an AN ratio ≥ 0.6. CFD simulation at inspiration and expiration were performed based on the three-dimensional (3D) models of the UA segmented from the CBCT images. The aerodynamic characteristics in terms of pressure drop (ΔP), maximum midsagittal velocity (Vms), and maximum wall shear stress (Pws) were compared by paired t-test and Wilcoxon test according to the normality test at T0 and T1.ResultsThe aerodynamic characteristics in UA revealed no statistically significant difference after RME. The maximum Vms (m/s) decreased from 2.79 to 2.28 at expiration after RME (P = 0.057).ConclusionThe aerodynamic characteristics were not significantly changed after RME. Further CFD studies with more cases are warranted.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times