Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Effect of novel technology-enabled multidimensional physical activity feedback in primary care patients at risk of chronic disease – the MIPACT study: a randomised controlled trial

  • Peacock, Oliver J.1
  • Western, Max J.1
  • Batterham, Alan M.2
  • Chowdhury, Enhad A.1
  • Stathi, Afroditi3
  • Standage, Martyn1
  • Tapp, Alan4
  • Bennett, Paul1
  • Thompson, Dylan1
  • 1 University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK , Bath (United Kingdom)
  • 2 Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK , Middlesbrough (United Kingdom)
  • 3 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK , Birmingham (United Kingdom)
  • 4 University of West of England, Bristol, UK , Bristol (United Kingdom)
Published Article
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Aug 08, 2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-00998-5
Springer Nature


BackgroundTechnological progress has enabled the provision of personalised feedback across multiple dimensions of physical activity that are important for health. Whether this multidimensional approach supports physical activity behaviour change has not yet been examined. Our objective was to examine the effectiveness of a novel digital system and app that provided multidimensional physical activity feedback combined with health trainer support in primary care patients identified as at risk of chronic disease.MethodsMIPACT was a parallel-group, randomised controlled trial that recruited patients at medium (≥10 and < 20%) or high (≥20%) risk of cardiovascular disease and/or type II diabetes from six primary care practices in the United Kingdom. Intervention group participants (n = 120) received personal multidimensional physical activity feedback using a customised digital system and web-app for 3 months plus five health trainer-led sessions. All participants received standardised information regarding physical activity. Control group participants (n = 84) received no further intervention. The primary outcome was device-based assessment of physical activity at 12 months.ResultsMean intervention effects were: moderate-vigorous physical activity: -1.1 (95% CI, − 17.9 to 15.7) min/day; moderate-vigorous physical activity in ≥10-min bouts: 0.2 (− 14.2 to 14.6) min/day; Physical Activity Level (PAL): 0.00 (− 0.036 to 0.054); vigorous physical activity: 1.8 (− 0.8 to 4.2) min/day; and sedentary time: 10 (− 19.3 to 39.3) min/day. For all of these outcomes, the results showed that the groups were practically equivalent and statistically ruled out meaningful positive or negative effects (>minimum clinically important difference, MCID). However, there was profound physical activity multidimensionality, and only a small proportion (5%) of patients had consistently low physical activity across all dimensions.ConclusionIn patients at risk of cardiovascular disease and/or type II diabetes, MIPACT did not increase mean physical activity. Using a sophisticated multidimensional digital approach revealed enormous heterogeneity in baseline physical activity in primary care patients, and practitioners may need to screen for low physical activity across dimensions rather than rely on disease-risk algorithms that are heavily influenced by age.Trial registrationThis trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN18008011; registration date 31 July 2013).

Report this publication


Seen <100 times