Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Reduction of radiation exposure and improvement of image quality with BMI-adapted prospective cardiac computed tomography and iterative reconstruction

European Journal of Radiology
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.055
  • 256-Slice Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Image Quality
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Prospective Ecg-Triggering
  • Iterative Reconstruction
  • Computer Science
  • Medicine


Abstract Purpose To assess the impact of body mass index (BMI)-adapted protocols and iterative reconstruction algorithms (iDose) on patient radiation exposure and image quality in patients undergoing prospective ECG-triggered 256-slice coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods Image quality and radiation exposure were systematically analyzed in 100 patients. 60 Patients underwent prospective ECG-triggered CCTA using a non-tailored protocol and served as a ‘control’ group (Group 1: 120kV, 200mAs). 40 Consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent prospective CCTA, using BMI-adapted tube voltage and standard (Group 2: 100/120kV, 100–200mAs) versus reduced tube current (Group 3: 100/120kV, 75–150mAs). Iterative reconstructions were provided with different iDose levels and were compared to filtered back projection (FBP) reconstructions. Image quality was assessed in consensus of 2 experienced observers and using a 5-grade scale (1=best to 5=worse), and signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were quantified. Results CCTA was performed without adverse events in all patients (n=100, heart rate of 47–87bpm and BMI of 19–38kg/m2). Patients examined using the non-tailored protocol in Group 1 had the highest radiation exposure (3.2±0.4mSv), followed by Group 2 (1.7±0.7mSv) and Group 3 (1.2±0.6mSv) (radiation savings of 47% and 63%, respectively, p<0.001). Iterative reconstructions provided increased SNR and CNR, particularly when higher iDose level 5 was applied with Multi-Frequency reconstruction (iDose5 MFR) (14.1±4.6 versus 21.2±7.3 for SNR and 12.0±4.2 versus 18.1±6.6 for CNR, for FBP versus iDose5 MFR, respectively, p<0.001). The combination of BMI adaptation with iterative reconstruction reduced radiation exposure and simultaneously improved image quality (subjective image quality of 1.4±0.4 versus 1.9±0.5 for Group 2 reconstructed using iDose5 MFR versus Group 1 reconstructed using FBP, p<0.05). Conclusions Prospective ECG-triggered 256-slice CCTA allows for visualization of the coronary artery tree with high image quality within a wide range of heart rates and BMIs. The combination of BMI-adapted protocols with iterative reconstruction algorithms can reduce radiation exposure for the patients and simultaneously improve image quality.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.