Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Evaluation of nutritional screening tools for patients scheduled for cardiac surgery

DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.08.006
  • Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire
  • Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool
  • Mini-Nutritional Assessment
  • Nutritional Risk Screening 2002
  • Subjective Global Assessment
  • Nutritional Screening
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Medicine


Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of different nutritional screening tools in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with regard to an adverse clinical course. Methods This prospective cohort study analyzed 894 adult patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were screened using four nutritional screening tools: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ). Nutritional status was assessed using the Subjective Global Assessment. In-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of hospitalization were analyzed. Results The sensitivities of the SNAQ, MUST, and NRS-2002 to detect the malnutrition confirmed by the Subjective Global Assessment were 91.5%, 97.9%, and 38.3%, respectively, and the MNA showed a sensitivity of 81.8% for the elderly. Malnutrition detected by the SNAQ, MUST, and NRS-2002 was associated with postoperative complications (odds ratios [ORs] 1.75, 1.98, and 1.82, respectively) and a stay in the intensive care unit longer than 2 d (ORs 1.46, 1.56, and 2.8). Malnutrition as detected by the SNAQ and MUST was also associated with prolonged hospitalization (ORs 1.49 and 1.59). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, postoperative complications were independently predicted by the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (OR 1.1, P < 0.0001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.01, P < 0.0001), and malnutrition identified by the MUST (OR 1.2, P = 0.01). Conclusion The MUST independently predicts postoperative complications. The SNAQ and MUST have comparable accuracy in detecting malnutrition. Whether preoperative nutritional therapy would improve the outcome in malnourished patients needs to be studied.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

Prognostic value of nutritional screening tools fo...

on Interactive cardiovascular and... May 2013

Evaluation of nutritional screening tools among pa...

on The Journal of heart valve dis... March 2013

[Preoperative risk evaluation in cardiac patients...

on Anestezjologia intensywna tera... 2008

Clinical and seasonal variations of nutritional ri...

on The Heart Surgery Forum December 2013
More articles like this..