How well do anthropometric indices correlate with cardiovascular risk factors? A cross-sectional study in Croatia

Affordable Access

Publisher Website

How well do anthropometric indices correlate with cardiovascular risk factors? A cross-sectional study in Croatia

Authors
Publisher
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
Volume
18
Issue
2
Identifiers
DOI: 10.12659/msm.882451
Keywords
  • Public Health

Abstract

Summary Background Usefulness of anthropometric indices (AI) as predictors of CV risk is unclear and remains controversial. Material/Methods To evaluate the correlation between AI and CV risk factors in the Croatian adult population and to observe possible differences between coastal and inland regions and urban and rural settlements. CRISIC-fm (ISRCTN31857696) is a prospective, randomized cohort study conducted in GP (general practitioner) practices in Croatia. Between May and July 2008, 59 GPs each recruited 55 participants aged ≥40 years, who visited a practice for any reason. Height, weight, waist and hip circumference and blood pressure were measured. Blood samples were analyzed in accredited laboratories. Results Out of 2467 participants (61.9% women, 38.1% men), 36.3% were obese, with fewer in coastal than inland areas. More obese people were in rural areas. Logistic regression showed BMI was the most important predictor of hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia in both regions (except for diabetes in the coastal area), and for urban and rural settlements (except for diabetes in rural areas). WtHR was a significant predictor for hypertension and dyslipidemia in the coastal (but only for hypertension in the inland area), and in urban settlements (in rural only for hypertension). None of the AI showed significant correlation with total CV risk, but WC and BMI did with stroke risk. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses showed that WtHR was a better predictor than all other AI for hypertension and dyslipidemia. Conclusions Results encourage the use of BMI and WtHR as important tools in predicting CV risk in GP’s practice.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.