Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Dual-energy CT in gout patients: Do all colour-coded lesions actually represent monosodium urate crystals?

Authors
  • Christiansen, Sara Nysom1, 2
  • Müller, Felix Christoph3, 4
  • Østergaard, Mikkel1, 2
  • Slot, Ole1
  • Møller, Jakob M.3
  • Børgesen, Henrik F.3
  • Gosvig, Kasper Kjærulf3
  • Terslev, Lene1, 2
  • 1 Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens Vej 17, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark , Glostrup (Denmark)
  • 2 University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark , Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • 3 Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark , Herlev (Denmark)
  • 4 Siemens Healthineers, Ballerup, Denmark , Ballerup (Denmark)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication Date
Sep 11, 2020
Volume
22
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02283-z
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundDual-energy CT (DECT) can acknowledge differences in tissue compositions and can colour-code tissues with specific features including monosodium urate (MSU) crystals. However, when evaluating gout patients, DECT frequently colour-codes material not truly representing MSU crystals and this might lead to misinterpretations. The characteristics of and variations in properties of colour-coded DECT lesions in gout patients have not yet been systematically investigated.The objective of this study was to evaluate the properties and locations of colour-coded DECT lesions in gout patients.MethodsDECT of the hands, knees and feet were performed in patients with suspected gout using factory default gout settings, and colour-coded DECT lesions were registered. For each lesion, properties [mean density (mean of Hounsfield Units (HU) at 80 kV and Sn150kV), mean DECT ratio and size] and location were determined. Subgroup analysis was performed post hoc evaluating differences in locations of lesions when divided into definite MSU depositions and possibly other lesions.ResultsIn total, 4033 lesions were registered in 27 patients (23 gout patients, 3918 lesions; 4 non-gout patients, 115 lesions). In gout patients, lesions had a median density of 160.6 HU and median size of 6 voxels, and DECT ratios showed an approximated normal distribution (mean 1.06, SD 0.10), but with a right heavy tail consistent with the presence of smaller amounts of high effective atomic number lesions (e.g. calcium-containing lesions).The most common locations of lesions were 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP1), knee and midtarsal joints along with quadriceps and patella tendons. Subgroup analyses showed that definite MSU depositions (large volume, low DECT ratio, high density) had a similar distribution pattern, whereas possible calcium-containing material (high DECT ratio) and non-gout MSU-imitating lesions (properties as definite MSU depositions in non-gout patients) were primarily found in some larger joints (knee, midtarsal and talocrural) and tendons (Achilles and quadriceps). MTP1 joints and patella tendons showed only definite MSU depositions.ConclusionColour-coded DECT lesions in gout patients showed heterogeneity in properties and distribution. MTP1 joints and patella tendons exclusively showed definite MSU depositions. Hence, a sole focus on these regions in the evaluation of gout patients may improve the specificity of DECT scans.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times