Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Dual-energy computed tomography vs ultrasound, alone or combined, for the diagnosis of gout: a prospective study of accuracy.

Authors
  • Singh, Jasvinder A1, 2, 3
  • Budzik, Jean-François4, 5
  • Becce, Fabio6
  • Pascart, Tristan5, 7
  • 1 Medicine Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center.
  • 2 Department of Medicine at School of Medicine.
  • 3 Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, University of Lille, Lomme.
  • 5 ULR 4490, Marrow Adiposity and Bone Laboratory (MABLab), University of Lille, Lille, France. , (France)
  • 6 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. , (Switzerland)
  • 7 Department of Rheumatology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, University of Lille, Lomme, France. , (France)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
Publication Date
Oct 02, 2021
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
4861–4867
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa923
PMID: 33410491
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

To examine the accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) vs ultrasound or their combination for the diagnosis of gout. Using prospectively collected data from an outpatient rheumatology clinic at a tertiary-care hospital, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of either modality alone or their combination, by anatomical site (feet/ankles and/or knees), for the diagnosis of gout. We used two standards: (i) demonstration of monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid (gold), and (ii) modified (excluding DECT and ultrasound) 2015 ACR-EULAR gout classification criteria (silver). Of the 147 patients who provided data, 48 (33%) had synovial fluid analysis performed (38 were monosodium urate-crystal positive) and mean symptom duration was 9.2 years. One hundred (68%) patients met the silver standard. Compared with the gold standard, diagnostic accuracy statistics for feet/ankles DECT, feet/ankles ultrasound, knees DECT and knees ultrasound were, respectively: sensitivity: 87%, 84%, 91% and 58%; specificity: 100%, 60%, 87% and 80%; positive predictive value: 100%, 89%, 97% and 92%; negative predictive value: 67%, 50%, 70% and 33%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.93, 0.72, 0.89 and 0.66. Combining feet/ankles DECT with ultrasound or knees DECT with ultrasound led to a numerically higher sensitivity compared with DECT alone, but overall accuracy was lower. Similarly, combining imaging knees to feet/ankles also yielded a numerically higher sensitivity and negative predictive values compared with feet/ankles DECT alone, without differences in overall accuracy. Findings were replicated compared with the silver standard, but with lower numbers. Feet/ankles or knees DECT alone had the best overall accuracy for gout diagnosis. The DECT-US combination or multiple joint imaging offered no additional increase in overall diagnostic accuracy. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology 2021. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times