Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Does growing atmospheric CO2 explain increasing carbon sink in a boreal coniferous forest?

Authors
  • Launiainen, Samuli1
  • Katul, Gabriel G2
  • Leppä, Kersti1
  • Kolari, Pasi3
  • Aslan, Toprak3
  • Grönholm, Tiia4
  • Korhonen, Lauri5
  • Mammarella, Ivan3
  • Vesala, Timo3, 6, 7
  • 1 Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Finland. , (Finland)
  • 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • 3 Faculty of Science, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. , (Finland)
  • 4 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland. , (Finland)
  • 5 University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland. , (Finland)
  • 6 Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. , (Finland)
  • 7 Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
Publication Date
May 01, 2022
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
2910–2929
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16117
PMID: 35112446
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

The terrestrial net ecosystem productivity (NEP) has increased during the past three decades, but the mechanisms responsible are still unclear. We analyzed 17 years (2001-2017) of eddy-covariance measurements of NEP, evapotranspiration (ET) and light and water use efficiency from a boreal coniferous forest in Southern Finland for trends and inter-annual variability (IAV). The forest was a mean annual carbon sink (252 [ ± 42] gC m-2a-1 ), and NEP increased at rate +6.4-7.0 gC m-2a-1 (or ca. +2.5% a-1 ) during the period. This was attributed to the increasing gross-primary productivity GPP and occurred without detectable change in ET. The start of annual carbon uptake period was advanced by 0.7 d a-1 , and increase in GPP and NEP outside the main growing season contributed ca. one-third and one-fourth of the annual trend, respectively. Meteorological factors were responsible for the IAV of fluxes but did not explain the long-term trends. The growing season GPP trend was strongest in ample light during the peak growing season. Using a multi-layer ecosystem model, we showed that direct CO2 fertilization effect diminishes when moving from leaf to ecosystem, and only 30-40% of the observed ecosystem GPP increase could be attributed to CO2 . The increasing trend in leaf-area index (LAI), stimulated by forest thinning in 2002, was the main driver of the enhanced GPP and NEP of the mid-rotation managed forest. It also compensated for the decrease of mean leaf stomatal conductance with increasing CO2 and LAI, explaining the apparent proportionality between observed GPP and CO2 trends. The results emphasize that attributing trends to their physical and physiological drivers is challenged by strong IAV, and uncertainty of LAI and species composition changes due to the dynamic flux footprint. The results enlighten the underlying mechanisms responsible for the increasing terrestrial carbon uptake in the boreal zone. © 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times