Affordable Access

Does apolipoprotein E determine outcome of infection by varicella zoster virus and by Epstein Barr virus?

Authors
  • Wozniak, Matthew A
  • Shipley, Suzanne J
  • Dobson, Curtis B
  • Parker, Simon P
  • Scott, Fiona T
  • Leedham-Green, Mary
  • Breuer, Judy
  • Itzhaki, Ruth F
Type
Published Article
Journal
European journal of human genetics : EJHG
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2007
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
672–678
Identifiers
PMID: 17356546
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

Over 90% of the population are infected with varicella zoster virus (VZV) but only some develop shingles - caused when the virus reactivates from latency, and only some shingles patients develop post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), defined as pain continuing for more than about 4 months. Epstein Barr virus (EBV) similarly infects over 90% of the population; some of those infected during teenage or young adult years develop infectious mononucleosis (IM). The reason for these disparities between numbers infected and numbers affected by illness is unknown, but presumably reflects host factor(s). Our previous results showed that apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype determines susceptibility to, or outcome of, infection in the case of several diseases of known infectious cause. Therefore, we investigated APOE genotypes of shingles, PHN, and IM patients. Our rationale for the previous studies and for investigating VZV was that these micro-organisms use for cell binding and entry the same sites in the cell surface as does the protein apoE, and that consequently, competition with apoE could affect the pathogen's extent of entry and hence extent of the damage caused. The APOE genotypes of shingles and PHN sufferers, and of IM sufferers were determined using restriction fragment length polymorphism. In females, epsilon4 homozygosity confers a risk of shingles and also of IM, and the APOE-epsilon4 allele is protective against PHN whereas APOE-epsilon3 allele is a risk. Our results showing that a host genetic factor influences the development of shingles and PHN in females have clinical significance: they could lead to identification of those (female) patients at greater risk of PHN, thus enabling these people to be targeted for treatment with the most effective drugs.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times