Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Do people with elevated social anxiety respond differently to digital and face-to-face communications? Two daily diary studies with null effects

Authors
  • Doorley, James D.
  • Volgenau, Kristina M.
  • Kelso, Kerry C.
  • Kashdan, Todd B.
  • Shackman, Alexander J.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of affective disorders
Publication Date
Jul 23, 2020
Volume
276
Pages
859–865
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.069
PMID: 32739703
PMCID: PMC7484355
Source
PubMed Central
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

Background: Retrospective studies have found that people with elevated social anxiety (SA) show a preference for digital/online communication, which may be due to perceptions of enhanced emotional safety. Whether these preferences for/benefits of digital compared to face-to-face communication manifest in the real world has yet to be explored. Methods: We recruited samples of college students (N = 125) and community adults (N = 303) with varying levels of SA, sampled their emotions during digital and face-to-face communication using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) (Study 1) and a day reconstruction method (DRM) (Study 2), and preregistered our hypotheses ( https://osf.io/e4y7x/ ). Results: Results from both studies showed that SA did not predict the likelihood of engaging in digital compared to face-to-face communication, and SA was associated with less positive and more negative emotions regardless of communication medium. Study 2 also showed that whether digital communication was synchronous (e.g., in real time via phone/video chat) or asynchronous (e.g., texting/instant messaging) did not impact the association between SA and emotions. Limitations: EMA and DRM methods, despite their many advantages, may be suboptimal for assessing the occurrence of digital communication behaviors relative to more objective methods (e.g., passively collecting smartphone communication data). Using event-contingent responding may have also yielded more reports of digital communication, thus strengthening our power to detect small, cross-level interaction effects. Conclusions: These results challenge beliefs that digital/online communication provides a source of emotional safety for people with elevated SA and suggests a greater need to address SA-related emotional impairments across digital communication platforms.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times