Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: comparison of readout-segmented and single-shot EPI techniques

Authors
  • Chen, Haihu
  • Chen, Luguang
  • Liu, Fang
  • Lu, Jianping
  • Xu, Chuanliang
  • Wang, Li
Type
Published Article
Journal
Cancer Imaging
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Aug 27, 2019
Volume
19
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0245-1
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundTo evaluate whether readout-segment echo-planar imaging (RS-EPI) can provide better image quality in assessing bladder cancer than single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) and to compare quantitative imaging parameters derived from both techniques.MethodsSeventy patients with bladder lesions were enrolled and underwent diffusion-weighted imaging on a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner using axial RS-EPI and SS-EPI techniques. Two observers independently assessed the susceptibility, detectability, motion artefacts and blurring of the images using qualitative scores. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal intensity ratio (SIR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and ADC values of the bladder lesions were measured and compared between the two techniques and between two observers. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of image quality were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. In addition, the agreement of the ADC measurements was evaluated using ICC values and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsSixty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The scores of image susceptibility, detectability and blurring for RS-EPI were significantly higher than those for SS-EPI (all p < 0.05), while the motion artefact was not. There were significant differences between RS-EPI and SS-EPI in the CNR and SIR values (all p < 0.05) but not in the SNR or ADC values (all p > 0.05). The ICC values and Bland-Altman plots also showed excellent agreement between the measured ADC values of the bladder lesions.ConclusionsThe RS-EPI technique provides significantly better image quality in patients with bladder cancer than the SS-EPI technique, without a significant difference in the ADC value.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times