Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Dietary Bacillus spp. enhanced growth and disease resistance of weaned pigs by modulating intestinal microbiota and systemic immunity

Authors
  • He, Yijie1
  • Jinno, Cynthia1
  • Kim, Kwangwook1
  • Wu, Zhaohai2
  • Tan, Bie3
  • Li, Xunde1
  • Whelan, Rose4
  • Liu, Yanhong1
  • 1 University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA , Davis (United States)
  • 2 Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China , Beijing (China)
  • 3 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, 410125, China , Changsha (China)
  • 4 Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, 63457, Germany , Hanau-Wolfgang (Germany)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Sep 15, 2020
Volume
11
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s40104-020-00498-3
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious research has shown that dietary supplementation of Bacillus spp. probiotics exerts beneficial effects on animals’ growth. However, limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of Bacillus spp. on weaned pigs and their effects on host gut health and microbiome, and systemic immunity using a disease challenge model. The objective of this experiment was to investigate the effects of two Bacillus spp. strains (Bacillus subtilis DSM 32540 and Bacillus pumilus DSM 32539) on growth performance, diarrhea, intestinal health, microbiome, and systemic immunity of weaned pigs experimentally infected with an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC).ResultsPigs in PRO1 (Bacillus subtilis DSM 32540) had greater (P < 0.05) body weight on d 7 and 14 PI, greater (P < 0.05) ADG from d 0 to 7 and d 7 to 14 PI, compared with pigs in CON (Control). Pigs in PRO1 had milder (P < 0.05) diarrhea on d 2 and 3 PI compared with pigs in CON. However, no differences were observed in growth performance and diarrhea score between PRO2 (Bacillus pumilus DSM 32539) and CON groups. Supplementation of PRO1 decreased (P < 0.05) lymphocyte counts on d 7 and 14 PI, compared with CON. Supplementation of PRO1 and PRO2 both reduced (P < 0.05) total coliforms in mesenteric lymph nodes on d 21 PI. Pigs in PRO2 had greater (P < 0.05) goblet cell number and sulfomucin percentage in duodenal villi and greater (P < 0.05) sialomucin percentage in jejunal villi than pigs in CON. Supplementation of PRO1 up-regulated (P < 0.05) MUC2 gene expression in jejunal mucosa and reduced (P < 0.05) PTGS-2 and IL1B gene expression in ileal mucosa on d 21 PI, compared with CON. Pigs in PRO1 had reduced (P < 0.05) relative abundance of families Lachnospiraceae, Peptostreptococcaceae and Pasteurellaceae in the ileum.ConclusionsSupplementation of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32540 improved growth performance, alleviated diarrhea severity, enhanced gut health, and reduced systemic inflammation of weaned pigs infected with ETEC F18. Although Bacillus pumilus DSM 32539 was able to alleviate systemic inflammation, it had limited impacts on growth performance and severity of diarrhea of ETEC F18 challenged weaned pigs.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times