Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Development and validation of a new algorithm model for differential diagnosis between Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis: a combination of laboratory, imaging and endoscopic characteristics

  • Lu, Yi1, 2
  • Chen, Yonghe2, 1
  • Peng, Xiang2, 1
  • Yao, Jiayin2, 1
  • Zhong, Weijie1, 2
  • Li, Chujun1, 2
  • Zhi, Min2, 1
  • 1 the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, People’s Republic of China , Guangzhou (China)
  • 2 The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, People’s Republic of China , Guangzhou (China)
Published Article
BMC Gastroenterology
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Jul 13, 2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01838-x
Springer Nature
  • Research


BackgroundSometimes in clinical practice, it is a great challenge to distinguish Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB), we conducted this study to identify simple and useful algorithm for distinguishing them.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical history of the patients who were diagnosed as ITB or CD. We firstly identified ITB patients, and then the patients diagnosed with CD were matched by age, sex, and admission time in a 1:1 ratio. Patients who admitted between May 1, 2013 and April 30, 2019 were regarded as training cohort, and patients admitted between May 1, 2019 and May 1, 2020 were regarded as validation cohort. We used multivariate analysis to identify the potential variables, and then we used R package rpart to build the classification and regression tree (CART), and validated the newly developed model.ResultsIn total, the training cohort included 84 ITB and 84 CD patients, the validation cohort included 22 ITB and 22 CD patients. Multivariate analysis showed that, positive interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), ≥ 4 segments involved, longitudinal ulcer, circular ulcer, and aphthous ulcer were confirmed as independent discriminating factors. Using these parameters to build the CART model made an overall accuracy rate was 88.64%, with sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV being 90.91%, 86.36%, 90.48% and 86.96%, respectively.ConclusionWe developed a simple and novel algorithm model covering laboratory, imaging, and endoscopy parameters with CART to differentiate ITB and CD with good accuracy. Positive IGRAs and circular ulcer were suggestive of ITB, while ≥ 4 segments involved, longitudinal ulcer, and aphthous ulcer were suggestive of CD.

Report this publication


Seen <100 times