Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Detection of atypical data in multicenter clinical trials using unsupervised statistical monitoring.

Authors
  • Trotta, Laura1
  • Kabeya, Yuusuke2, 3
  • Buyse, Marc4, 5
  • Doffagne, Erik1
  • Venet, David6
  • Desmet, Lieven7
  • Burzykowski, Tomasz8, 9
  • Tsuburaya, Akira10
  • Yoshida, Kazuhiro11
  • Miyashita, Yumi12
  • Morita, Satoshi13
  • Sakamoto, Junichi12, 14
  • Praveen, Paurush1
  • Oba, Koji2, 15
  • 1 CluePoints S.A., Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. , (Belgium)
  • 2 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 3 EPS Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 4 International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • 5 CluePoints, Wayne, PA, USA.
  • 6 Institut de Recherches Interdisciplinaires et de Développements en Intelligence Artificielle (IRIDIA), University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. , (Belgium)
  • 7 Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA), University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. , (Belgium)
  • 8 International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. , (Belgium)
  • 9 Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. , (Belgium)
  • 10 Department of Surgery, Jizankai Medical Foundation, Tsuboi Cancer Center Hospital, Koriyama, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 11 Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 12 Epidemiological and Clinical Research Information Network (ECRIN), Okazaki, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 13 Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 14 Tokai Central Hospital, Kakamigahara, Japan. , (Japan)
  • 15 Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. , (Japan)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Clinical trials (London, England)
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2019
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
512–522
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1177/1740774519862564
PMID: 31331195
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

A risk-based approach to clinical research may include a central statistical assessment of data quality. We investigated the operating characteristics of unsupervised statistical monitoring aimed at detecting atypical data in multicenter experiments. The approach is premised on the assumption that, save for random fluctuations and natural variations, data coming from all centers should be comparable and statistically consistent. Unsupervised statistical monitoring consists of performing as many statistical tests as possible on all trial data, in order to detect centers whose data are inconsistent with data from other centers. We conducted simulations using data from a large multicenter trial conducted in Japan for patients with advanced gastric cancer. The actual trial data were contaminated in computer simulations for varying percentages of centers, percentages of patients modified within each center and numbers and types of modified variables. The unsupervised statistical monitoring software was run by a blinded team on the contaminated data sets, with the purpose of detecting the centers with contaminated data. The operating characteristics (sensitivity, specificity and Youden's J-index) were calculated for three detection methods: one using the p-values of individual statistical tests after adjustment for multiplicity, one using a summary of all p-values for a given center, called the Data Inconsistency Score, and one using both of these methods. The operating characteristics of the three methods were satisfactory in situations of data contamination likely to occur in practice, specifically when a single or a few centers were contaminated. As expected, the sensitivity increased for increasing proportions of patients and increasing numbers of variables contaminated. The three methods showed a specificity better than 93% in all scenarios of contamination. The method based on the Data Inconsistency Score and individual p-values adjusted for multiplicity generally had slightly higher sensitivity at the expense of a slightly lower specificity. The use of brute force (a computer-intensive approach that generates large numbers of statistical tests) is an effective way to check data quality in multicenter clinical trials. It can provide a cost-effective complement to other data-management and monitoring techniques.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times