Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables
- Authors
- Type
- Published Article
- Journal
- Behavior Research Methods
- Publisher
- Springer - Psychonomic Society
- Publication Date
- Jun 20, 2016
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 638–652
- Identifiers
- DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8
- Source
- Springer Nature
- Keywords
- License
- Green
Abstract
The analysis of R×C contingency tables usually features a test for independence between row and column counts. Throughout the social sciences, the adequacy of the independence hypothesis is generally evaluated by the outcome of a classical p-value null-hypothesis significance test. Unfortunately, however, the classical p-value comes with a number of well-documented drawbacks. Here we outline an alternative, Bayes factor method to quantify the evidence for and against the hypothesis of independence in R×C contingency tables. First we describe different sampling models for contingency tables and provide the corresponding default Bayes factors as originally developed by Gunel and Dickey (Biometrika, 61(3):545–557 (1974)). We then illustrate the properties and advantages of a Bayes factor analysis of contingency tables through simulations and practical examples. Computer code is available online and has been incorporated in the “BayesFactor” R package and the JASP program (jasp-stats.org).