Affordable Access

In defense of creeping legalism in arbitration.

Authors
Disciplines
  • Law

Abstract

In recent years, labor arbitration has been subjected to the criticism that it has become the captive of practitioners who have deprived it of informality of process and speed of decision. Instead, the critics allege, arbitration proceedings have become increasingly formal, technical, and expensive. Often such criticisms fall short of facing the basic issue of the function of arbitration in labor-management relations. As the author of this discussion sees this issue, the labor relations community has much to gain in the development of arbitration as a judicial system based on a 'common law' of labor relations. Current dissatisfaction with arbitration, he argues, will diminish as orderly rules and standards of procedure develop and reliance on precedent, cautiously applied, increases. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Creeping, Creeping.

on California medicine December 1955

JCAH: labels and legalisms.

on Bulletin of the American Colle... June 1983

Medico-legalism.

on Medicine Science and the Law July 1970

Legalism and medical ethics.

on The Journal of medicine and ph... March 1979
More articles like this..