Affordable Access

Is systematic downside beta risk really priced? Evidence in emerging market data



Several studies advocating safety first as a major concern to investors propose downside beta risk as an alternative to the traditional systematic risk-beta. Downside measures are concerned with a subset of the data and therefore the results in the studies that consider the downside beta only may be biased. This study addresses this issue by including downside co-skewness risk in addition to the downside beta risk in the pricing model. In a sample of 27 emerging markets two-stage rolling regression analysis fails to support pricing models with downside risk measures. In a cross-sectional analysis inclusion of downside co-skewness improves model fit. When considered together, downside beta is potential and downside co-skewness is a risk to the rational investor. Even though our results are inconclusive the evidence strongly suggests a need for further investigation of co-skewness risk in pricing models that adopt a downside risk framework.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

Is co-skewness a better measure of risk in the dow...

on Journal of Multinational Finan... Jan 01, 2007

Local risk factors in emerging markets: Are they s...

on Journal of Empirical Finance Jan 01, 2006

Traditional beta, downside risk beta and market ri...

on The Quarterly Review of Econom... Jan 01, 2004

Emerging markets, downside risk and the asset allo...

on Emerging Markets Review Jan 01, 2001
More articles like this..