Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Comparative statics analysis of density controls

Authors
Journal
Journal of Urban Economics
0094-1190
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
32
Issue
3
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/0094-1190(92)90019-h

Abstract

Abstract The general similarity of the results of comparative statics in a semiclosed and in a fully closed city have been demonstrated by Pines and Sadka ( Journal of Urban Economics 20, 1–20, 1986). The objective of this paper is to determine if the consequences of different forms of public regulation of the urban land market are also invariant with respect to the type of city. The conclusion is that while there are well-defined consequences of such controls on metropolitan area and land values in a semiclosed city, the impacts in a fully closed city are generally ambiguous. Therefore, proposals for the introduction of zoning and density regulation have to be city-specific and take into consideration the pattern of land ownership and the extent of leakage of urban land rent income.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Comparative statics analysis of a fully closed cit...

on Journal of Urban Economics Jan 01, 1986

Nash equilibrium vs. maximin:A comparative game st...

on European Journal of Political... Jan 01, 1993

Welfare and comparative statics implications of fa...

on Journal of Public Economics Jan 01, 1986
More articles like this..