and (d) a rough surface with an obstacle present. We show that data from both measurement techniques indicate that a rough surface reduces global current velocities and the magnitude of turbidity current phenomena, including Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities and lobe-and-cleft formation. However, by coupling the techniques, photometric data give valuable insight into the spatial development of instabilities, such as the grouping of lobe and cleft formations. The presence of an obstacle causes local regions of an increased and decreased velocity, but does not affect the global current velocity. Additionally, the obstacle created three local intensity maxima upstream, dissipating to two maxima downstream, supporting the presence of local eddies. The study shows that the combination of UVP and photometry is an effective way forward for obtaining detailed qualitative and quantitative insights into turbulent flow characteristics and we highlight the potential for future research.