Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Cost-effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention in high-risk individuals for diabetes in a low- and middle-income setting: Trial-based analysis of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program

Authors
  • Sathish, Thirunavukkarasu1, 2
  • Oldenburg, Brian1, 1
  • Thankappan, Kavumpurathu R.3, 4
  • Absetz, Pilvikki5, 6
  • Shaw, Jonathan E.7
  • Tapp, Robyn J.1, 8, 9
  • Zimmet, Paul Z.10
  • Balachandran, Sajitha3, 11
  • Shetty, Suman S.1
  • Aziz, Zahra1, 12
  • Mahal, Ajay1
  • 1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia , Melbourne (Australia)
  • 2 McMaster University, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada , Hamilton (Canada)
  • 3 Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India , Trivandrum (India)
  • 4 Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India , Kasaragod (India)
  • 5 University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland , Kuopio (Finland)
  • 6 Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland , Tampere (Finland)
  • 7 Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia , Melbourne (Australia)
  • 8 King’s College London, London, UK , London (United Kingdom)
  • 9 Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, Australia , Coventry (Australia)
  • 10 Monash University, Melbourne, UK , Melbourne (United Kingdom)
  • 11 Population Research Centre, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, Kerala, India , Trivandrum (India)
  • 12 School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Kerala, Australia , Melbourne (Australia)
Type
Published Article
Journal
BMC Medicine
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publication Date
Sep 04, 2020
Volume
18
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01704-9
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundData on the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle-based diabetes prevention programs are mostly from high-income countries, which cannot be extrapolated to low- and middle-income countries. We performed a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a lifestyle intervention targeted at preventing diabetes in India.MethodsThe Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of 1007 individuals conducted in 60 polling areas (electoral divisions) in Kerala state. Participants (30–60 years) were those with a high diabetes risk score and without diabetes on an oral glucose tolerance test. The intervention group received a 12-month peer-support lifestyle intervention involving 15 group sessions delivered in community settings by trained lay peer leaders. There were also linked community activities to sustain behavior change. The control group received a booklet on lifestyle change. Costs were estimated from the health system and societal perspectives, with 2018 as the reference year. Effectiveness was measured in terms of the number of diabetes cases prevented and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Three times India’s gross domestic product per capita (US$6108) was used as the cost-effectiveness threshold. The analyses were conducted with a 2-year time horizon. Costs and effects were discounted at 3% per annum. One-way and multi-way sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar in the two study groups. Over 2 years, the intervention resulted in an incremental health system cost of US$2.0 (intervention group: US$303.6; control group: US$301.6), incremental societal cost of US$6.2 (intervention group: US$367.8; control group: US$361.5), absolute risk reduction of 2.1%, and incremental QALYs of 0.04 per person. From a health system perspective, the cost per diabetes case prevented was US$95.2, and the cost per QALY gained was US$50.0. From a societal perspective, the corresponding figures were US$295.1 and US$155.0. For the number of diabetes cases prevented, the probability for the intervention to be cost-effective was 84.0% and 83.1% from the health system and societal perspectives, respectively. The corresponding figures for QALY gained were 99.1% and 97.8%. The results were robust to discounting and sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsA community-based peer-support lifestyle intervention was cost-effective in individuals at high risk of developing diabetes in India over 2 years.Trial registrationThe trial was registered with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12611000262909). Registered 10 March 2011.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times