Affordable Access

Access to the full text

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)

Authors
  • Kirkham, Jamie J.1
  • Gorst, Sarah1
  • Altman, Douglas G.2
  • Blazeby, Jane3
  • Clarke, Mike4
  • Devane, Declan5
  • Gargon, Elizabeth1
  • Williamson, Paula R.1
  • 1 University of Liverpool, Department of Biostatistics, Liverpool, UK , Liverpool (United Kingdom)
  • 2 University of Oxford, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK , Oxford (United Kingdom)
  • 3 University of Bristol, School of Social & Community Medicine, Bristol, UK , Bristol (United Kingdom)
  • 4 Queen’s University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, Belfast, UK , Belfast (United Kingdom)
  • 5 National University of Ireland Galway & West Northwest Hospitals Group, Galway, Ireland , Galway (Ireland)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Trials
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Aug 22, 2015
Volume
16
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundCore outcome sets can increase the efficiency and value of research and, as a result, there are an increasing number of studies looking to develop core outcome sets (COS). However, the credibility of a COS depends on both the use of sound methodology in its development and clear and transparent reporting of the processes adopted. To date there is no reporting guideline for reporting COS studies. The aim of this programme of research is to develop a reporting guideline for studies developing COS and to highlight some of the important methodological considerations in the process.Methods/DesignThe study will include a reporting guideline item generation stage which will then be used in a Delphi study. The Delphi study is anticipated to include two rounds. The first round will ask stakeholders to score the items listed and to add any new items they think are relevant. In the second round of the process, participants will be shown the distribution of scores for all stakeholder groups separately and asked to re-score. A final consensus meeting will be held with an expert panel and stakeholder representatives to review the guideline item list. Following the consensus meeting, a reporting guideline will be drafted and review and testing will be undertaken until the guideline is finalised. The final outcome will be the COS-STAR (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting) guideline for studies developing COS and a supporting explanatory document.DiscussionTo assess the credibility and usefulness of a COS, readers of a COS development report need complete, clear and transparent information on its methodology and proposed core set of outcomes. The COS-STAR guideline will potentially benefit all stakeholders in COS development: COS developers, COS users, e.g. trialists and systematic reviewers, journal editors, policy-makers and patient groups.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times