Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography vs. Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography vs. contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: assessment of treatment response by patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Authors
  • Ohno, Yoshiharu
  • Koyama, Hisanobu
  • Yoshikawa, Takeshi
  • Nishio, Mizuho
  • Matsumoto, Sumiaki
  • Matsumoto, Keiko
  • Aoyama, Nobukazu
  • Nogami, Munenobu
  • Murase, Kenya
  • Sugimura, Kazuro
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2012
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
612–623
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23680
PMID: 22566188
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

Dynamic perfusion MRI has better capability for assessment of therapeutic effect on CTEPH patients than does MDCT.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times