Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Computer Modeling and Simulation: Increasing Reliability by Disentangling Verification and Validation

Authors
  • Pronskikh, Vitaly1
  • 1 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, 60510, USA , Batavia (United States)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Minds and Machines
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Publication Date
Mar 20, 2019
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
169–186
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s11023-019-09494-7
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

Verification and validation (V&V) of computer codes and models used in simulations are two aspects of the scientific practice of high importance that recently have been discussed widely by philosophers of science. While verification is predominantly associated with the correctness of the way a model is represented by a computer code or algorithm, validation more often refers to the model’s relation to the real world and its intended use. Because complex simulations are generally opaque to a practitioner, the Duhem problem can arise with verification and validation due to their entanglement; such an entanglement makes it impossible to distinguish whether a coding error or the model’s general inadequacy to its target should be blamed in the case of a failure. I argue that a clear distinction between computer modeling and simulation has to be made to disentangle verification and validation. Drawing on that distinction, I suggest to associate modeling with verification and simulation, which shares common epistemic strategies with experimentation, with validation. To explain the reasons for their entanglement in practice, I propose a Weberian ideal–typical model of modeling and simulation as roles in practice. I examine an approach to mitigate the Duhem problem for verification and validation that is generally applicable in practice and is based on differences in epistemic strategies and scopes. Based on this analysis, I suggest two strategies to increase the reliability of simulation results, namely, avoiding alterations of verified models at the validation stage as well as performing simulations of the same target system using two or more different models. In response to Winsberg’s claim that verification and validation are entangled I argue that deploying the methodology proposed in this work it is possible to mitigate inseparability of V&V in many if not all domains where modeling and simulation are used.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times