Comparison of radial versus brachial approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography when the femoral approach is contraindicated.
- Published Article
The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publication Date
Mar 15, 1998
One hundred patients with contraindications to the femoral approach were randomized to undergo diagnostic coronary angiography via percutaneous radial puncture or brachial artery cutdown. Procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and total radiation dose were significantly less via the radial route, whereas procedural success, complication rates, and pain scores were comparable; we conclude that the radial technique should be the arm approach of choice for new trainees, although there will be occasions when radial access fails and a brachial approach is required.
Report this publication
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
This record was last updated on 07/02/2016 and may not reflect the most current and accurate biomedical/scientific data available from NLM.
The corresponding record at NLM can be accessed at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9527090