Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Comparison of the modified Smith-Petersen (S-P) and ilioinguinal (I-I) approaches for periacetabular osteotomy in adult developmental dysplasia of the hip: a retrospective study

Authors
  • Luo, Rui1
  • Li, Guomin1
  • Li, Bo1
  • Hu, Ruyin1
  • Li, Yankun1
  • 1 Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, No. Zhongshandong Rd, Nanming District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, 550002, China , Guiyang (China)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Publisher
Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
Publication Date
Feb 24, 2021
Volume
16
Issue
1
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02255-2
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Green

Abstract

BackgroundAdult developmental dysplasia of the hip is an untreated congenital hip dysplasia that results in adult hip pain. One of the usual and effective methods for the treatment of this condition is periacetabular osteotomy. However, which approach is better between the modified S-P and the I-I approaches is still unclear and controversial.Method and materialsWe retrospectively assessed our experience with the modified S-P and the I-I approaches by inquiring and evaluating intraoperative blood loss, postoperative radiographic material, postoperative function of the hip, and related complications from July 2014 to January 2019.ResultsA total of 61 patients with adult developmental dysplasia of the hip were enrolled, and 33 patients were divided into a modified S-P group and 28 patients were divided into I-I group. The operation time and blood loss of group I-I were higher than that of group modified S-P. Other clinical and radiographic indexes showed no statistical significance between group the modified S-P and I-I groups.ConclusionThere is no significant difference in the improvement of the function of the hip at the post-operation stage, but group I-I may require more operation time and blood loss at the intra-operation stage.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times