Affordable Access

Comparison of food frequency questionnaires: the reduced Block and Willett questionnaires differ in ranking on nutrient intakes.

Authors
  • Wirfält, A K
  • Jeffery, R W
  • Elmer, P J
Type
Published Article
Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Date
Dec 15, 1998
Volume
148
Issue
12
Pages
1148–1156
Identifiers
PMID: 9867258
Source
Medline
License
Unknown

Abstract

Food frequency questionnaires, major tools in epidemiologic studies, are often criticized for biased and imprecise intake estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two widely used food frequency questionnaires, a reduced 60-item Block questionnaire and a 153-item Willett food frequency questionnaire, relative to three 24-hour recalls administered by telephone. The dietary data were collected in 1991 from a group of healthy women age 25-49 years (n=101) during the baseline period of a weight-loss intervention study in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Total energy and macro- and micronutrient intakes were compared across methods by using four analytic approaches: comparison of means and correlation coefficients, regression analysis, and estimation of percent agreement between each questionnaire and recalls. The Block instrument showed an overall underestimation bias, but was more successful in categorizing individuals on percent energy from fat and carbohydrate intakes than was the Willett instrument. The Willett instrument showed no overall underestimation bias and was more successful in classifying individuals on vitamin A and calcium intakes. Diverging performance characteristics of diet assessment methods have an implication for the design of studies, interpretation of results, and comparison of findings across studies.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times