Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Comparing Apple and Pear Phenology and Model Performance: What Seven Decades of Observations Reveal

Authors
  • drepper, bianca
  • gobin, anne
  • remy, serge
  • van orshoven, jos
Publication Date
Jan 04, 2020
Identifiers
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10010073
OAI: oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4395/10/1/73/
Source
MDPI
Keywords
Language
English
License
Green
External links

Abstract

Based on observations for the beginning of the flowering stage of Malus domestica (apple) and Pyrus communis (pear) for the 1950–2018 period, phenological trends in north-eastern Belgium were investigated in function of temperatures during dormancy. Moreover, two different phenological models were adapted and evaluated. Median flowering dates of apple were on average 9.5 days earlier following warm dormancy periods, and 11.5 days for pear, but the relationship between bloom date and temperature was found not to be linear, suggesting delayed fulfilment of dormancy requirements due to increased temperatures during the chilling period. After warm chilling periods, an average delay of 5.0 and 10.6 days in the occurrence date of dormancy break was predicted by the phenological models while the PLSR reveals mixed signals regarding the beginning of flowering. Our results suggest overlapping chilling and forcing processes in a transition phase. Regarding the beginning of flowering, a dynamic chill model coupled to a growing degree days estimation yielded significantly lower prediction errors (on average 5.0 days) than a continuous chill-forcing model (6.0 days), at 99% confidence level. Model performance was sensitive to the applied parametrization method and limitations for the application of both models outside the past temperature ranges became apparent.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times