Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Comparative Evaluation of Three Software Packages for Liver and Spleen Segmentation and Volumetry.

Authors
  • Pattanayak, Puskar1
  • Turkbey, Evrim B1
  • Summers, Ronald M2
  • 1 Clinical Image Processing Service, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • 2 Clinical Image Processing Service, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland; Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Dr., Building 10, Rm. 1C224D MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892-1182. Electronic address: [email protected]
Type
Published Article
Journal
Academic radiology
Publication Date
Jul 01, 2017
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
831–839
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.02.001
PMID: 28258903
Source
Medline
Keywords
License
Unknown

Abstract

Both automated packages (Claron and Vitrea) measured liver and spleen volumes that were accurate and quick before manual correction. Volumes for the liver were more accurate than those for the spleen, perhaps due to the much smaller splenic volumes compared to those of the liver. For both liver and spleen, manual corrections were time consuming and for most subjects did not significantly change the volume measurement.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times