Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Comparative assessment of soil microbial biomass determined by the methods of direct microscopy and substrate-induced respiration

Authors
  • Ananyeva, N. D.1
  • Polyanskaya, L. M.2
  • Susyan, E. A.1
  • Vasenkina, I. V.2
  • Wirth, S.3
  • Zvyagintsev, D. G.2
  • 1 Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, ul. Institutskaya 2, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290, Russia , Pushchino, Moscow oblast (Russia)
  • 2 Moscow State University, Faculty of Soil Science, Vorobyevy Gory 1, Moscow, 119992, Russia , Moscow (Russia)
  • 3 Institute of Landscape Matter Dynamics, ZALF, Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Muncheberg, Germany , Muncheberg (Germany)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Microbiology
Publisher
Pleiades Publishing
Publication Date
Jun 21, 2008
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
356–364
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1134/S0026261708030168
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

The content of microbial biomass (MB) was determined in samples of gray forest, chestnut, and tundra soils with different physicochemical properties (0.4–22.7% Corg; 8.4–26.8% silt particles; pH 4.3–8.4) by the methods of substrate-induced respiration (MBSIR) and direct microscopy (MBM). The samples of two upper soil layers, 0–5 and 5–10 cm (without plant litter), from different ecosystems (forest, forest shelter belt, meadow, fallow, and arable) and elements of relief of interfluvial tundra (block/upper land plateau, depression between blocks) have been analyzed. The content of microbial biomass in the 0–5-cm soil layer was 216–8134 and 348–7513 μg C/g soil as measured by the methods of substrate-induced respiration and direct microscopy, respectively. The MBSIR and MBM values closely correlated with each other: r = 0.90 and 0.74 for 0–5 and 5–10 cm, respectively. The average MBSIR/MBM ratio was 90 and 60% for 0–5 and 5–10 cm, respectively. The portion of microbial carbon in total organic soil carbon was, on average, 4 and 3% (SIR) and 5 and 7% (direct microscopy) for 0–5 and 5–10 cm, respectively. Possible reasons for the differences between MBSIR and MBM values in the soils under study are discussed.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times