Affordable Access

Access to the full text

Comparative analysis of real-time PCR assays in the detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis

Authors
  • Nunes, Juliana Barbosa1
  • Coura-Vital, Wendel2
  • Colombo, Fabio Antônio3
  • Baêta, Frederico José Moreira4
  • Pinheiro, Aimara Costa5
  • Roatt, Bruno Mendes2
  • Reis, Levi Eduardo Soares2
  • Reis, Alexandre Barbosa2
  • Marques, Marcos José4
  • 1 University of São Paulo, College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil , São Paulo (Brazil)
  • 2 Federal University of Ouro Preto, Nucleus of Research in Biological Sciences (NUPEB), Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil , Ouro Preto (Brazil)
  • 3 Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty, Laboratory of Clinical Parasitology, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil , Alfenas (Brazil)
  • 4 Universidade Federal de Alfenas – UNIFAL-MG, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Gabriel Monteiro da Silva Street, 700, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, 37130-001, Brazil , Alfenas (Brazil)
  • 5 Zoonosis Control Center, Municipal Health Secretariat, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil , Governador Valadares (Brazil)
Type
Published Article
Journal
Parasitology Research
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Publication Date
Aug 07, 2018
Volume
117
Issue
10
Pages
3341–3346
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-018-6038-9
Source
Springer Nature
Keywords
License
Yellow

Abstract

Dogs are important hosts and reservoirs of leishmaniasis, a disease caused by protozoan parasites from the genus Leishmania, affecting ~12 million people worldwide. The detection of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in dogs by real-time PCR (qPCR) may improve on diagnosis, but the different qPCR methods available for Leishmania DNA detection have not been established as routine in diagnostic tools and/or epidemiologic studies for canine VL. Here, we compared three qPCR assays (DNApol, Linj31, and LDON) in the detection of VL by Leishmania infantum in spleen (n = 48; 7), skin (n = 48; 7), and whole blood (n = 44; 7) samples from serologically positive and negative dogs, respectively. Overall, the DNApol performed better than the Linj31 and LDON assays in the detection of positive samples in all tissues tested, yielding from 66.7 to 100.0% of positivity for both skin and spleen samples. For spleen samples, we observed no statistically significant differences between positive detection by the LDON and DNApol assays. Whole blood samples yielded the lowest rates of positive detection, regardless of the qPCR assay used. In contrast, positive detection of Leishmania DNA was as efficient from skin samples using the DNApol assay as from spleen samples using either the DNApol or the LDON assay. Although qPCR assays from skin samples may not be practical for use in the field, our study suggests that the DNApol and LDON assays from skin samples could be used in future to evaluate canine VL treatment in veterinary clinics.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times