Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Clinicopathological predictors of survival in resected primary lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors
  • Jhala, Hiral1
  • Harling, Leanne2
  • Rodrigo, Alberto3
  • Nonaka, Daisuke4
  • Mclean, Emma4
  • Ng, Wen4
  • Okiror, Lawrence5
  • Bille, Andrea6, 7
  • 1 Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK [email protected].
  • 2 Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Catalunya, Spain. , (Spain)
  • 4 Pathology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
  • 5 Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
  • 6 Department of Thoracic Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
  • 7 Division of Cancer, King's College London, London, UK.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Publication Date
May 01, 2022
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
310–315
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207388
PMID: 33827933
Source
Medline
Keywords
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

Primary lung adenocarcinoma consists of a spectrum of clinical and pathological subtypes that may impact on overall survival (OS). Our study aims to evaluate the impact of adenocarcinoma subtype and intra-alveolar spread on survival after anatomical lung resection and identify different prognostic factors based on stage and histological subtype. Newly diagnosed patients undergoing anatomical lung resections without induction therapy, for pT1-3, N0-2 lung adenocarcinoma from April 2011 to March 2013, were included. The effect of clinical-pathological factors on survival was retrospectively assessed. Two hundred and sixty-two patients were enrolled. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS were 88.8%, 64.3% and 51.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed lymphovascular, parietal pleural and chest wall invasion to confer a worse 1-year and 5-year prognosis (all p<0.0001). Solid predominant adenocarcinomas exhibited a significantly worse OS (p=0.014). Multivariate analysis did not identify solid subtype as an independent prognostic factor; however, identified stage >IIa, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002) and intra-alveolar spread (p=0.009) as significant independent predictors of worse OS. Co-presence of intra-alveolar spread and solid predominance significantly reduced OS. Disease-free survival (DFS) was reduced with parietal pleural (p=0.0007) and chest wall invasion (p<0.0001), however, adenocarcinoma subtype had no significant impact on DFS. Our study demonstrates that solid predominant adenocarcinoma, intra-alveolar spread and lymphovascular invasion confer a worse prognosis and should be used as a prognostic tool to determine appropriate adjuvant treatment. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times