Affordable Access

deepdyve-link
Publisher Website

Clinical Evaluation of Intraoperative Near Misses in Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors
  • Curtis, Nathan J1, 2
  • Dennison, Godwin1
  • Brown, Chris S B3
  • Hewett, Peter J4
  • Hanna, George B2
  • Stevenson, Andrew R L5, 6
  • Francis, Nader K1, 7
  • 1 Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK.
  • 2 Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • 3 National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 4 Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 5 Faculty of Medical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 6 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. , (Australia)
  • 7 Faculty of Science, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Type
Published Article
Journal
Annals of surgery
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2021
Volume
273
Issue
4
Pages
778–784
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003452
PMID: 31274657
Source
Medline
Language
English
License
Unknown

Abstract

To investigate the frequency, nature, and severity of intraoperative adverse near miss events within advanced laparoscopic surgery and report any associated clinical impact. Despite implementation of surgical safety initiatives, the intraoperative period is poorly documented with evidence of underreporting. Near miss analyses are undertaken in high-risk industries but not in surgical practice. Case video and data from 2 laparoscopic total mesorectal excision randomized controlled trials were analyzed (ALaCaRT ACTRN12609000663257, 2D3D ISRCTN59485808). Intraoperative adverse events were identified and categorized using the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique. The EAES classification was applied by 2 blinded assessors. EAES grade 1 events (nonconsequential error, no damage, or need for correction) were considered near misses. Associated clinical impact was assessed with early morbidity and histopathology outcomes. One hundred seventy-five cases contained 1113 error events. Six hundred ninety-eight (62.7%) were near misses (median 3, IQR 2-5, range 0-15) with excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability (κ=0.86, 95% CI 0.83-0.89, P < 0.001 and κ=0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.9, P < 0.001 respectively). Significantly more near misses were seen in patients who developed early complications (4 (3-6) vs. 3 (2-4), P < 0.001). Higher numbers of near misses were seen in patients with more numerous (P = 0.002) and more serious early complications (P = 0.003). Cases containing major intraoperative adverse events contained significantly more near misses (5 (3-7) vs. 3 (2-5), P < 0.001) with a major event observed for every 19.4 near misses. Intraoperative adverse events and near misses can be reliably and objectively captured in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Near misses are commonplace and closely associated with morbidity outcomes. Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Report this publication

Statistics

Seen <100 times